Energy Efficiency and Building Science News

High-Density Polyiso Cover Boards Provide Excellent Protection

Tue, 2019-06-11 20:21
Energy Efficiency

ProtectoR HD High Density Polyiso Cover Board by John’s Manville provides excellent protection and can save time and expense for contractors. With a closed cell polyiso foam core and inorganic coated glass facers, the high-density cover board has a Grade 1 compressive strength and an R-value of 2.5.

The product offers excellent resistance to moisture, hail, wind uplift and puncture, plus its light weight makes it easy to handle.

 

A“Power of Two:” DuPont Performance Building Solutions Announces New Commercial Wall Warranty

Tue, 2019-06-11 20:13
Press Releases

Effective June 1, 2019, DuPont Performance Building Solutions will reinforce the trusted performance of Tyvek® Commercial products in combination with the durable thermal properties of STYROFOAM™ and THERMAX™ through the new DuPont Commercial Wall2 Ten Year Product and Labor Warranty. For qualifying projects installed using DuPont™ Tyvek® CommercialWrap® products or Tyvek® Fluid Applied WB+™, in combination either with STYROFOAM™ Brand Extruded Polystyrene (XPS) or THERMAX™ Brand Rigid Insulation on the above grade wall, the building will be protected through the “power of two” DuPont Commercial Wall2warranty.

The new DuPont Commercial Wall2 Product and Labor Warranty will include:

  • Water Hold-Out
  • Air Hold-Out
  • U.V. Exposure (before cladding installation) and
  • Up to 50 years thermal[1]

DuPont’s portfolio of solutions is designed for robust, durable product performance combined with easy, fast installation for labor savings. Our scientists and engineers recognize that durable communities rely on advanced material science with simple, reproducible installation that can be trusted time after time.

“At DuPont, we test our products and assemblies significantly above and beyond the building code requirements to develop rigorous installation details and guides that support our warranty,” said Tom Evans, Americas Commercial Director, DuPont Performance Building Solutions. “This unique combined system warranty supports our company’s strong leadership position in innovations, performance and reliability. The Commercial Wall “Power of Two” system offering is part of the first of its kind for one supplier to step up to support designers/installer/building owners with durable system solutions that protect structures for thriving communities.”

Visit us and learn more at booth 5838 during the 2019 AIA Conference on Architecture, taking place June 6-8, 2019 in Las Vegas, NV. Solutions featured include:

  •  STYROFOAM™ Brand Extruded Polystyrene (XPS) provides energy efficiency through a more sustainable insulation solution for the entire building envelope. STYROFOAM™ XPS is the original extruded polystyrene foam insulation and the first in a portfolio of products that would continue to grow and evolve to meet the needs of the building and construction industry and its related markets.
     
  • Tyvek® CommercialWrap® building wrap is an air and water barrier made to stand up to the rigors of commercial job sites, with high tear-strength, durability, and up to nine months of UV resistance. Tyvek® Building Envelope Solutions help make buildings more durable, comfortable and energy-efficient.
     
  •  THERMAX™ Brand Rigid Insulation is a polyisocyanurate rigid board insulation for interior and exterior continuous insulation. THERMAX™ products include an innovative core surrounded by a tough exterior facer of a variety of ranges and aesthetic appearance.
     
  •  Tyvek® Fluid Applied WB+™ is a next-generation weather barrier with Silyl-terminated polyether (STPE) technology. The Tyvek® Fluid Applied WB+™ system combines superior air/water holdout and industry-leading vapor permeability, into a membrane that provides fast rain resistance with high elongation and recovery properties on most commercial substrates.
     
  • Corian® Exteriors by DuPont has offered architects around the globe unparalleled design flexibility for more than a decade. Corian® Solid Surface is a highly durable and low maintenance material unique with through-body color for beautiful, yet functional exterior solutions that can be easily installed as a ventilated rainscreen system.
     
  • LIQUIDARMOR™ Flashing and Sealant product line is an innovative, liquid applied flashing alternative to traditional, self-adhered flashing tape. These elastomeric spray or trowel applied products form a tight, seamless barrier along the rough openings of windows and doors while helping to significantly reduce labor time.
     
  • The hyperefficient, high-performance FROTH-PAK™ Foam Sealant is designed to fill gaps and penetrations greater than 2” quickly and affordably, helping eliminate unwanted airflow throughout a home, ensuring customers are covered top to bottom, inside and out on every job.
     
  • GREAT STUFF™ Insulating Foam Sealants are specially formulated to seal gaps and cracks to block air, moisture and even pests — making it perfect for any of project needs. The GREAT STUFF PRO™ Series is designed to help pros get the job done fast, professionally and cost efficiently, providing customers with more energy efficient, comfortable homes. 
[1] Exact thermal warranty duration depends on product and assembly.

About DuPont Safety & Construction
DuPont Safety & Construction is a global leader in delivering innovation for life's essential needs in water, shelter and safety; enabling its customers to win through unique capabilities, global scale and iconic brands including Corian®, Kevlar®, Nomex® Tyvek®, Styrofoam™ Brand and Filmtec®.

DuPont™, the DuPont Oval Logo, and all products, unless otherwise noted, denoted with ™, SM or ® are trademarks, service marks or registered trademarks of affiliates of DuPont de Nemours, Inc.

 

Are Builders Ready for California's Switch to Net Zero?

Tue, 2019-06-11 20:02
Housing & Construction

With almost 40 million people, California is the most populous state in the nation. It’s big enough to be a country, and not a small country at that: California’s economy is the fifth largest in the world. So when California makes policy, there’s a ripple effect.

Starting in 2020, houses in California will be required to include solar panels on the roof, with the goal that the house, taking on-site power generation into consideration, will produce about as much electricity each year as it uses. The details are a little squishy, and there are some exceptions. Still, the requirement is serious, and it’s going to mean serious changes for the state’s builders.

Some builders are ready. Scottsdale, Ariz.–based Meritage Homes, for example, builds almost 2,000 homes per year in California, in addition to the thousands more it builds nationwide. The firm, which ranks No. 7 on the latest Builder 100 list, reported a total of 8,531 closings for 2018. BUILDER's sister publication, JLC, recently talked with C.R. Herro, vice president of innovation at Meritage.

“We have been building net zero for eight years,” Herro says. “We were the first big production builder to build to Energy Star, and we’ve been voluntarily building well ahead of compulsory code in California and all throughout the country for quite a while. So for us, it was a much shorter putt to get our homes to zero.”

Photo Courtesy of Meritage Homes: Solar panels on the tile roof of a Meritage home

Still, not every house Meritage builds is a zero-energy house—far from it. Even for Meritage, building every house in California to the state’s Zero Net Energy standard will be a stretch. The company buys the goal, says Herro: “Energy efficiency and renewable energy is the right financial thing to do at everybody’s price point, from entry level to luxury.” But Herro has concerns with the way the policy is being implemented. Inevitably, a zero-energy house with solar panels on the roof will cost more to buy than an existing home that was built before the mandate took effect. The houses will cost less to operate than comparable houses without zero-energy details, of course, and Herro believes the net-zero house is a better deal for the buyer in terms of the total cost of ownership. But he’s concerned that buyers won’t realize the advantages—at least, not without help.

“California and everybody else that has been pushing an energy-efficient and renewable-energy agenda isn’t enabling it," Herro explains. "What I mean by that is that they’re not differentiating the value of this energy-efficiency and renewable-energy benefit in the transaction. The evolution from my perspective is, we have to change appraisals and underwriting and possibly go to a labeling system that captures both the selling price of the home and the operating cost of the home. I consider that the true cost of ownership. That way, buyers can make more informed decisions.”

There’s a lot more to a zero-energy house than a solar array on the roof. “We put in high-performance windows, we do advanced framing details to reduce thermal bridging, we do better insulation, we do better air-sealing details, we do more efficient lighting, more efficient heating and cooling systems, more efficient water-heating systems, more efficient appliances," Herro says. "What you look at is how many kilowatts you reduce for every dollar you have to spend. And there’s a lot you do that is more financially responsible before you get to solar.

Photo Courtesy of Imery Group: A net-zero house built by the Imery Group

‘Reduce Before You Produce’

Another California builder who’s ahead of the Zero Net Energy curve is De Young Properties, based in Clovis, in the state’s Central Valley. De Young now has three developments in progress devoted to net-zero housing, all with building-integrated solar on every house. But company vice president Brandon De Young says the company followed the mantra to “reduce before you produce,” beginning with improvements—such as more efficient heating and cooling systems, higher-performing windows, and LED lighting—that could be made without changing the construction process. “My job over the last decade has been optimizing the energy-efficient features of our homes, to become the most cost-effective possible,” says De Young. “You do a lot of bidding to figure out what is the most cost-effective of all these different choices that you make.”

Changes that affect construction workflows came later in the process. “Once you’ve gotten past the low-hanging fruit, and you’re starting to have to make some important design changes in how you actually construct the home, that’s where it starts to become more challenging,” says De Young. For example, it took around two years to convert the company’s wall-framing practices from the conventional California method of 2x4 studs 16 inches on-center to an “advanced framing” system of 2x6 walls 24 inches on-center. “It involved a lot of changes in drafting, and re-engineering, and of course going through the plan submittal process with all the jurisdictions we build in, making sure that they can reapprove all the plans with the new engineering designs,” says De Young.

Trades had to learn some new practices also, such as three-stud wall corners. And at interior wall intersections with exterior walls, instead of lumber-intensive stud backing, “we went to having the interior wall stop short about a half-inch or so, about the thickness of a sheet of drywall, and then you attach that to the exterior wall by hardware up at the top plate,” says De Young. “Now that wall cavity is totally free of lumber and you can fit a whole bunch of insulation in there. You don’t have hot and cold points in the exterior wall at the intersections.”

De Young Properties also made a major change in its attic designs, switching to the “High Performance Conditioned Attic” system from Owens Corning, which involves blowing fiberglass insulation behind netting suspended from truss top chords. “In summertime around here, it can be 100°F for 30 days in a row,” says De Young, “and in the attic it can be above 140°F.” Traditionally, air conditioners and ductwork have been located in that hot attic environment, with an associated penalty for system performance and occupant comfort. The firm looked at a number of strategies for bringing the equipment and ductwork into the conditioned space. “We decided to insulate the underside of the roof and basically encapsulate the whole attic space within the thermal boundary, so that we didn’t have to mess with where our HVAC equipment goes,” explains De Young.

Like Meritage, De Young Properties strives to stay ahead of the code. “Here in California, the Title 24 energy code is what rules,” says De Young. “Every few years they update it, and it gets more and more stringent. We know we’re going to have to continually improve regardless, just to even pull a building permit." His company's attitude has been to turn the energy code into a positive, working it into its day to day and making it part of its identity. "Since 2009 or so, even our non-zero-energy homes have exceeded the code significantly," he notes.

After squeezing as much out of the home’s energy demand as it could cost-effectively manage, De Young Properties turned to the supply side: solar panels on the roof. “Our solar partner is Tesla,” says De Young. “We’ve been working with them for about six years. They help us a lot with analysis of our consumption, and then the targets that we have to try to achieve on an annual basis for solar generation. We have a wide range of home sizes—one story, two story, 1,500 square feet all the way up to 4,000 square feet—so obviously the range of solar system sizes is wide. But we are usually around 4.5 to probably 9 kilowatts, depending upon the size of the home.”

Photo Courtesy of Meritage Homes: A Meritage net-zero model home in California

Selling the Dream

All of those improvements carry advantages beyond the simple energy-bill calculation. From durability to health to comfort, advanced homes are typically better than ordinary code-compliant houses. But how to communicate that value to a home buyer? At the Department of Energy, Sam Rashkin has been working on that problem for years. Rashkin is chief architect of the Building Technologies Office in the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, and point man for DOE’s Zero Energy Ready Homes (ZERH) program. Homes certified under the DOE program don’t have to be actual net-zero houses—they just need to have Home Energy Rating System (HERS) ratings low enough that solar panels on the roof would be able to bring the house to net zero. So what Rashkin is selling isn’t so much a lower energy bill (although the houses do have that) as a better home, period.

The DOE program is having a national impact. In Arizona, for example, production builder Mandalay Homes—No. 171 on this year's Builder 100/Next 100 list—certifies every house under the ZERH program. “But those houses aren’t net zero,” says Mandalay chief technology officer Geoff Ferrell. “That program is just some cool details and resources, prescriptively and performance path, that help you build a fundamentally better home that is more energy efficient and has some simple details that allow the builder or a future owner to go and make it net zero by adding PV to it.”

The DOE program requires houses to comply with EPA Energy Star standards, the EPA’s Indoor Air Plus specification, and the EPA’s WaterSense program. Rashkin breaks out the elements of a certified ZERH house into six categories: advanced water-management systems; an optimized comfort system; a complete indoor-air-quality system; an optimized enclosure system; efficient components throughout the house; and a solar-ready system (meaning conduit and electrical panel pre-positioned for solar installation at a later date). Rashkin says, “The ZERH program is a way for the homeowner to get this transformational experience by simply looking for a logo.”

If only it were always that easy. Atlanta-area custom builder Luis Imery certifies most of the homes he builds as Zero Energy Ready, and he has several houses to his credit that operate at net zero or better. But he says, “Certifications, at least in Georgia, don’t sell homes. The reality of our marketplace is that it’s not an efficiency-driven or healthy-driven market at the moment. The masses are not in tune with seeing the value of owning an energy-efficient home.”

So while Imery gently steers his clients in the direction of net zero, he does it through a process that puts the customer first. “We start our projects by asking our clients one single question: ‘What is your budget for this beautiful home that you have in mind?’ And we partner with our clients early. We have a framework that we take our clients through to ultimately arrive at a plan with specs and a budget that hits their target. It’s a collaborative process instead of trying to force things that we think are great, but may be not too important to our clients. But in that initial preconstruction process, we’re weighing all the options to be as close to Zero Energy Ready as we can, if we can hit it with the client; and if we can’t, we have that conversation with the client. So, our goal is for all our homes to be Zero Energy Ready. We are 80% there.”

Imery’s latest net-zero project is a home for Mitsubishi executive Mark Kuntz near Atlanta. The home earned a HERS rating in the low 40s without on-site power; an 8.1kW, 30-panel array on the garage brought the HERS score down to -13. The construction was above code, but not extreme: staggered-stud 2x4 walls on a 2x6 plate with R3 Zip-R sheathing, wall cavities insulated with R21 cellulose, and flat-ceiling truss roofs with R50 cellulose. Triple-glazed windows were chosen at the customer’s request, although Imery says that was overkill. The blower-door test came in at about 2.6 ACH50, a disappointment to Imery (caused, he says, by a subcontractor who completed insulation work before air-sealing a few critical junctures). The home is heated and cooled by Mitsubishi mini-split equipment. The ERV is a Broan Sky Series Fresh Air System, which has controls that limit the air intake when outdoor relative humidity is excessive. For supplemental humidity control, Imery installed an UltraAire MD33 in-wall dehumidifier.

For Imery, it’s not about selling a label. “On our website, you have to drill down to find any mention of labels,” he says. But he says clients become converts as the preconstruction and construction processes continue. “We even go under contract for construction and our clients are clueless that behind the scenes, we’re making every effort to make their home DOE Zero Energy Ready,” he says. “As they commit more to the relationship with us, we slowly unveil that this house is third-party verified. What happens is that through that process, they get excited, and they want to make it DOE Zero Energy Ready. So just changing the timing of that education and conversation has helped tremendously, because they’re not getting hit by a fire hose at the beginning.”

“All our homes are third-party verified,” says Imery. “Even if [the clients] don’t want to pay for it, we pay for it because that’s the assurance to the homeowner that ‘Listen: You trusted your largest investment in your life to us, here’s our product. By the way, don’t believe only us, your home was verified by this person who came through at all these different stages of construction to verify.’”

Photo Courtesy of Imery Group: A modern-style net-zero home built by the Imery Group

The Near-Zero Home

Meanwhile, in Arizona, production builder Mandalay Homes is aiming to build hundreds of Zero Energy Ready homes at a price point that competes with lesser-performing houses in its market. “In our climate, our houses would qualify for the DOE program with a HERS rating of about 57,” says Mandalay’s Geoff Ferrell. “The way we choose to build takes us down to a HERS 47 on average, without renewables.”

So what’s different about Mandalay’s envelope? “The first thing is slab edge insulation,” says Ferrell. “We gain six or seven HERS points simply by doing a good slab edge detail.” Wall and roof insulation and air sealing also boost the score, he says. “We are insulating the walls with an inch of continuous exterior EPS foam, and then we use open-cell spray foam in our walls and our cathedralized sealed attic. And then we air seal with AeroBarrier. We are sealing all of our homes down to 0.7 ACH50 or so.”

For Mandalay, Ferrell says, the Zero Energy Ready label is a significant value in the marketplace. “It’s brand recognition,” he says. “One of the other builders in our area builds to Energy Star. To the buying public, we build the same house. These other programs help us further differentiate the things that we’ve done to make our buildings healthier, more durable, and more water resistant, and then tie that to an independent certification that validates that it’s not just talk. The house really does perform better than the other guy’s.”

With a small solar array on the roof and a power storage battery in the garage, Mandalay’s average home rates about a HERS 29, not zero—and that’s by design. Says Ferrell, “Unless a customer specifically comes in and requests it for whatever reason, we will probably never build a HERS zero home again. Because in our climate zone, with our utility not paying for exported energy, HERS zero saves the customer no more money than like a HERS 20 house would. If you don’t have net metering, like we don’t in Arizona, unless you can store and use 100% of the energy that you generate and need throughout an average year, you’re not going to get a HERS zero.”

Ferrell explains, “What a lot of the country does, because of net-metering policies, is they basically put a big solar array on the rooftop, the home uses what it can use when it can, and then when it can’t, any excess gets exported into the grid, and then the consumer gets to buy it back at a later time, non-sunny hours or whatever, on a one-for-one import-export basis. Here in Arizona, we don’t have that scenario.”

The reason Arizona doesn’t have net-metering programs that buy solar power from homeowners at full retail value is that in Arizona, there’s already too much solar on the rooftops. On sunny days, rooftop systems produce more power than the utility can use. And California is looking at a similar problem—which is why the new solar mandate in California includes a proviso about batteries. Starting in 2020 in California, if builders install battery storage systems in houses, they can cut back the amount of photovoltaics by 25%. That may not be enough incentive to push batteries into the mainstream in California, but it’s a sign that the power mix of the future is sure to include storage along with on-site generation.

 

Metal Panels Selected for Energy-Positive School

Tue, 2019-06-11 15:22
Building ScienceEnergy Efficiency

The new Myrtle Beach Middle School in Myrtle Beach, S.C., offers a vision of the future, in both its eye-catching design and award-winning performance. The school, like four other new elementary and middle schools opened in less than two years by the Horry County School District (HCSD), is engineered to be net-energy positive. This means the schools were designed to generate more energy than they use over the course of the year.

Photo courtesy of hortonphotoinc.com

Designers mirrored that top-tier energy performance in their plans for a dynamic façade, punctuated by sharp corner angles, punched-out window shading and a dramatic entrance canopy sure to attract notice from all passersby. A bold color scheme created by broad expanses of PAC-CLAD Precision Series metal panels emphasizes this strong architectural statement.

“We felt we were creating a state-of-the-art facility. We wanted to create cutting-edge architecture to emphasize the cutting-edge approach of the school,” said Derrick Mozingo, AIA, senior partner and design principal with the hometown firm of Mozingo + Wallace, which designed the floorplans and exteriors of all five new schools in the HCSD system. “You don’t go by these buildings without noticing them.”

Mozingo’s firm was a key member of the design/build team that brought HCSD’s five new schools – including two other middle schools, an elementary and intermediate school – online in only 18 months. FirstFloor Energy Positive led the effort, with SFL+A as design professionals of record and Stantec doing interior design and programing work. Panel and roofing installer Spann Roofing also was on board from the start. That company’s president, Jimbo Spann, said the fast-track schedule kept his installers on their toes.

“It was a big undertaking. There was a lot of design going on throughout the project,” he said. “There were time periods when we were working on several schools at the same time.”

In total, Spann’s team installed more than 100,000 sq. ft. of PAC-CLAD 0.40-gauge aluminum HWP panels across all five schools, with colors chosen to highlight each facility’s athletic team’s colors. Mozingo said Petersen’s PAC-CLAD product supported both his budget and his aesthetic vision for the schools.

“It created a very affordable skin, and there was no other material out there that would create that look,” he said. “It gave us a surface that would weather well and gave us that architectural ‘tech’ look we were trying to achieve. We went through a number of studies to get what we ended up with.”

Mozingo said he and his team also counted on Spann Roofing’s expertise as they went through their studies. “We have had a relationship with Spann Roofing for 30 years,” he said. “They worked with us through the design process and were a large component of that process.”

For Spann’s installers, familiarity with the product and with Petersen also were big advantages. With its responsibility for the wall panels as well as roofing for all five schools, Spann Roofing depended on the kind of responsiveness to questions and schedule demands they knew Petersen could provide.

“Petersen was very helpful, making site visits and making sure everything was going well and that we didn’t have any questions,” he said, adding that the company also was critical in helping Spann keep up with HCSD’s aggressive timeline. “That took a lot from Petersen as well, in having the material ready on time. Without the material, we could have been in a world of trouble.”

With all five schools open, Spann now has had a little time to reflect on yet another successful project with Petersen and the company’s PAC-CLAD panels. “We know Petersen very well,” he said. “They’re like us – they do high-quality work and take a lot of pride in what they do, and it’s a top-of-the-line product.”

 

USC Professor Innovates Smart Building Materials for New Green Deal Era

Tue, 2019-06-11 15:06
Building ScienceEnergy Efficiency

How can the skin of a building function more like human skin? Doris Sung, Associate Professor of Architecture at USC, is tackling this question by developing some innovative building materials that utilize “thermo bi-metal,” a unique, dual-alloy metal that responds to heat and cold. 

Among her innovations is a double-paned window that contains bi-metal leaves that bend and flip depending on the temperature to help regulate heat intake and output from buildings. One of Sung’s goals is to model building materials more on natural processes, materials that are active and respond to changing environmental conditions.

“Human skin is very smart,” explained Sung at her Rolling Hills workshop. “It does so many different things. It can protect you from disease and heat and cold. So, building skin, if it can do more, then the central mechanical system doesn't have to pump so hard. You don’t have to use so much energy.”

Sung started delving into smart building materials when she saw the shortcomings of the traditional passive materials normally used in architecture. Her designs have an organic, almost sculptural feel, but the principles behind them are simple.

“Using computer programs, we can make things very fluidly change and once you start doing that, [the material] starts to be able to mimic human nature and things that happen in nature a little more,” said Sung.

But when dealing with builders who see cost as a bottom line, innovative materials can seem prohibitively costly and can hamper their adoption.

“Anything new in the building industry is going to be disruptive,” said Sung. “There's also difficulty because it also has to have safety concerns, durability, cost concerns, all these things that make designing a product for the building industry quite difficult to break through.”

One of the advantages of the bi-metal window system is that it's relatively low tech, so Sung says cost is not that much more than traditional windows. 

“We don't use high technology,” Sung explained. “We don't use computer chips and the installation is actually like in a typical windows system. So, I think most people think, 'oh, wow, this is going to really add a huge cost.' But it really isn't.”

Although these materials are still in the developmental stage, Sung says there's already plenty of interest from green builders, and that these materials can be a promising player in the future of architecture.

 

Expanded Polystyrene Use Growing With Rise of Pre-fabricated Housing

Tue, 2019-06-04 17:51
Building ScienceEnergy Efficiency

The trendy words in the market today are “off-site construction.” Tom Walker of British Plastics and Rubber says that “One trend in the [British] construction market is the use of pre-fabricated Structural Insulated Panels (SIPS).

This method utilises a technique where sections of buildings can be made offsite and then shipped directly to the building site can be quickly craned into position and bolted together.

This significantly cuts down on construction times when compared to traditional bricks and mortar methods and therefore reduces costs of manpower and materials required during building phases.

Pre-fabricated systems typically comprise of a range of interlocking panels, each of which is effectively a sandwich of grey EPS glued between an outer and inner board materials which is specified according to the building needs.

DS Smith offers a range of EPS blocks, available in a range of size and densities.

Its EPS block is widely used in the construction industry for wall and floor insulation, as well as in the packaging sector, where parts that are simple shapes can hot wire cut to protect corners and edges.

Using EPS as part of a pre-fabricated building system can also lower CO2 emissions when transporting building components to construction sites, as EPS is an exceptionally lightweight solution to many building applications, due to it being effectively 98 per cent air.”

This point of view confirms WTCA/SBCA's Framing the American Dream (FAD) which said roughly 145 hours for the entire off-site component framing process in 1995 & then again in 2015. Please see SBCA's Framing the American Dream and Best Way to Frame websites for more information.

SBCA developed a cost calculator that further proves the dollar value of “offsite framing”. To learn more about using this calculator as a sales tool please call Jess Lohse or Sean Shields at SBCA 608-274-4849 to review it.

The following video shows in very real terms the efficiency and labor savings that  “off-site framing” can provide.

This labor savings truth was born in 1952 thru the truss plate and has grown into a manufacturing industry worth greater than the $5 billion annually today.

The future of this industry will be written by off-site framing leaders who continue to innovate until no more improvements are possible. SBCA has a large group of very intelligent members working on innovation. We'd love to have more of the best & brightest working with us to evolve the off-site framing industry into the best innovative & valuable solution it can be. SBCA members will be leading the way here and we hope for many more to join us.

 

Insulated Cement Board

Tue, 2019-06-04 16:53
Building ScienceEnergy Efficiency

PermaBase CI Insulated Cement Board was created to provide durability and insulation in one lighter- weight package, says National Gypsum Co. PermaBase CI combines structure, insulation, and waterproofing, reducing the number of times a crew has to circle a house to prepare the exterior for cladding. It does not purport to provide an air barrier. It’s approved for adhered veneer finishes such as manufactured and natural stone, thin brick, and tile, as well as direct-applied coatings of synthetic stucco. Prices set by distributor; expect to pay about $2.50 to $3 a square foot. nationalgypsum.com

 

High Cost Perceived as Top Challenge in Meeting New Energy Codes

Tue, 2019-06-04 16:34
Building ScienceEnergy Efficiency

Construction costs enter the discussion during the development of all building codes. In recent years, the energy code has received particular scrutiny and criticism due to a series of substantial energy-efficient improvements from the 2006 to 2012 versions.

Adobe Stock

The International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) serves as the U.S. national model energy code and is adopted in nearly every state, except California. The IECC saw about a 30% improvement in energy savings in the 2012 version, compared to 2006.

A recent survey conducted by the Home Innovation Research Labs (HIRL) shows that cost is still top of mind for many builders when it comes to complying with the energy code. The survey, conducted in December 2018, found that 31% of the 300 builders that participated, cited cost as their top challenge in meeting the energy code.

The second most mentioned challenge was the skilled labor shortage, with 15%; followed by 14% of builders that said they had no challenges in meeting the energy code. The first response specifically addressing construction practices was “air tightness,” which was the fourth most-mentioned challenge with 10% of builders noting it.

With 14% of builders saying they have no challenges in meeting the energy code and 31% saying cost is their top challenge, this survey begs the question of why? In a LinkedIn post about the survey findings, Ed Hudson, the director of market research at HIRL, notes that many of the builders that answered “no issues” stated that they were already building beyond code minimums.

I believe there are two key factors that come into play in making cost a significant challenge when it comes to meeting energy code requirements:

  1. Size of the builder
  2. Education about energy-efficient construction practices

Larger builders, especially those included within the Builder 100, nationally, have the advantage of staff that can find the most cost effective way to comply with the energy codes where they build. These larger builders also have the benefit of being able to negotiate volume discounts with product suppliers. In addition, larger builders often have marketing staff that can help assemble a strategy for marketing the energy-efficient features of their home to prospective buyers.

One may assume that since smaller local and regional builders don’t necessarily have a staff to devote to finding the most cost effective ways that they aren’t building energy-efficient homes. That assumption would be far from the truth. In fact, many small builders are building the most innovative, energy-efficient and even net-zero homes. I would suggest that a deeper analysis of this issue will find that a lack of training and education about energy-efficient building practices as the primary reason that cost is a challenge for builders in meeting the energy code.

Although large production builders may have the benefit of staff that are trained and educated on building science, they also use trusted consultants and advisers to help them make decisions. That includes professionals that have been certified as Home Energy Raters (also known as HERS Raters) by the Residential Energy Services Network (RESNET). In fact, 81 of the top 100 builders in the U.S. used HERS Raters in 2017. With nearly 2,000 RESNET Certified HERS Raters across the U.S., builders of all sizes have access to a network of well trained and knowledgeable professionals that can help them cost effectively meet their local energy codes.

HERS Raters have the benefit of using the performance path or the Energy Rating Index path to demonstrate compliance with the energy code. This allows them the maximum flexibility in evaluating how to cost effectively comply with the code. The prescriptive path, which is the go-to compliance path for those that least understand the energy code, is typically the most expensive way for builders to demonstrate compliance because it allows little design flexibility.

survey done by the National Association of Home Builders on housing preferences asked what features are considered essential/desirable in a new home. The findings showed that energy-efficient strategies, including Energy Star appliances and windows and above-code insulation, made the most-wanted list and would positively influence the purchase decision of 80% or more of all home buyers. The Zillow Group’s Consumer Housing Trends Report found that energy efficiency was tied with preferred kitchen style, with nearly 50% of consumers desiring it in a home purchase.

These two surveys show that energy-efficient construction is quickly becoming an expectation of home buyers. Builders that are struggling to comply with energy codes need to work with energy efficiency professionals, like HERS Raters, to quickly understand the most cost effective means to meet energy codes and build an efficient home.

 

SIKA Continues to Grow Its Construction Products Business

Tue, 2019-06-04 16:22
Business

Sika has completed the acquisition of Parex on May 23, 2019. The deal was announced on January 8, 2019. With annual sales of CHF 1.2 billion, Parex is a leading mortar manufacturer with an impressive track record of profitable growth and attractive margins. Sika and Parex are two strong companies that are highly complementary in product offering and channel penetration. With this acquisition, Sika will expand its product portfolio for the building finishing market, further strengthening its world leader position in construction chemicals, and reaching sales in excess of CHF 8 billion for 2019.

Parex’ product offering includes facade mortars, tile adhesives, and waterproofing mortars. With its expertise in mortar solutions for renovation and new builds, Parex participates in all phases of the construction life cycle. Parex has a particularly strong presence in distribution channels, especially in China, where Parex has built up a network of over 90,000 points of sale. With its strong, recognized brands, Parex is known for its comprehensive R&D expertise and technical excellence. The company is locally present in 23 countries, with key positions in 8 core markets, and operates 74 plants around the world.

The acquisition of Parex will strengthen Sika’s growth platform. Its mortar business, which is a key growth technology for the group and one of its important earning contributors, will more than double in size to CHF 2.3 billion. Parex’s strong position in distribution channels will open up new business opportunities for Sika’s product range. Parex will gain access to Sika’s well established direct sales channels, and Parex’s expertise in the facade and tile setting business will allow Sika to participate in these growing and attractive market fields.

Paul Schuler, CEO of Sika: “With the acquisition we are bringing together two strong companies. Parex’ and Sika’s joint business activities present an excellent growth platform for both organizations. In addition to the highly complementary fit with regard to product offerings and channels, we also see that Parex and Sika have very similar culture, values and management styles   ̶   with the focus on customer orientation, empowerment, high-quality products and services. The integration planning is well on track, and on-site visits have confirmed the attractiveness of the combination of the two businesses. We are excited to start working together to build our joint successful future. We warmly welcome all employees of Parex to the Sika Family.”

Eric Bergé, CEO of Parex: “I am very proud of what we have achieved. I want to thank the entire Parex team worldwide for their outstanding work. The months spent together with Sika to prepare this day showed how much these two great teams can bring to each other. We can look to the future with confidence.”

Sika continues to grow its business in the construction market segment. For more information see the following links:

  • Being the market leader in PIR insulation technology for over 37 years, Rmax manufactures industry-recognized and ANSI code compliant insulation materials and accessories that are widely used all over the U.S.
  • Sarnafil has been developing and producing high-quality thermoplastic roofing membranes and system solutions for new building and renovation projects since 1962.
  • Liquid Plastics hold a significant market position in liquid membranes for roofing and waterproofing applications by joint sealing and concrete repair and protection. The membranes are used mainly for restoration for small to medium sized roofs.
  • May National Associates, Inc. is a leading manufacturer of silicone and polyurethane products for sealing and bonding. Manufacturers and markets a full range of silicone, polyurethane, hybrid, and acrylic sealants and adhesives.
  • Sikalastic membranes provide very reliable edge-to-edge waterproofing systems and flashing membranes for a multitude of smaller-scale applications.
  • Sika offers a full line of professional grade (Pro Select) specialty construction products for residential projects.
  • Roofing and waterproofing products protect buildings from weather conditions in all types of climates. 

 

The Pathway to High-Performance Buildings

Tue, 2019-06-04 16:01
Building ScienceEnergy Efficiency

Editor’s Note: Building envelope issues impact multiple performance issues in a building including HVAC performance, building pressures and increase the risk of moisture intrusion. If a properly design building envelop system is correctly aligned with thermal, air and moisture control layers problems from moisture intrusion, poor indoor air quality and comfort complaints are reduced. Missing details, incorrectly placed barriers, disconnects in the continuous systems are all common design considerations that will impact the building performance for years to come. Sealants or transition materials may not be specified correctly at intersections of components or there might be missing sealant requirements for penetrations by fasteners when installing cladding or bracing for exterior shading. Wall sections may promote thermal bridging, which is the unrestricted movement of heat through the wall section. This leads to excessive energy leakage and lost cost. The Continuous Insulation website was built to help provide the science behind details, like energy performance, transition detailing, WRBs, thermal bridging and so forth.

The term commissioning, referred to as Cx by the pros, is a process for new and existing buildings that ensures the systems and components in a building are designed, installed, tested, operated and maintained according to the operation requirements of the owner or final client. The commissioning process can improve the efficiency of the equipment and systems to prevent issues from construction, installation and maintenance negatively impacting the performance and energy usage over the lifespan of a building. Through a systematic evaluation of the buildings designed and implemented systems, the commissioning process formalizes review and integration of all project expectations during planning, design, construction and occupancy phases by inspection, functional and performance testing, and oversight of operator training and record documentation.

When assessing the benefits, barriers, opportunities and savings that encompass the commissioning process, who better to ask than a working industry professional with over 15 years’ experience in the field? In this Q&A session with NCBPA Board Chair and building scientist, Meghan McDermott of High-Performance Building Solutions, we will discuss the benefits, goals, setbacks and industry trends of all things Commissioning.

The Benefits of Pursuing Building Commissioning

Commissioning is an all-inclusive, quality assurance-based process working with project and operation teams which document the planning, delivery, verification, and managing risks to functions performed in, or by, buildings. Commissioning also helps to maximize energy efficiency, extended performance, and ensure environmental health and occupant safety. The process also improves indoor air quality by making sure the building components are working correctly and that the plans are implemented efficiently and effectively. Commissioning reduces operating costs while delivering preventive and predictive maintenance plans, tailored operating manuals and training procedures for all users to follow.

Meghan McDermott: "The main benefit of pursuing whole building commissioning is that there is an independent third party reviewing the design, construction and O&M of a building to ensure the overall performance meets the owner’s requirements. The process ensures the owner is getting what they need and want within their budget, hopefully without costly change orders once construction starts. Catching missing items or deficiencies in the design phases reduces the likely hood of costly changes during construction or worse when the building is completed and occupied."

Goals to Accomplish in Each Project

There are various goals associated to differing projects and building types, but generally, once setting a Commissioning scope, budget, plan and schedule, the overall goal is to deliver buildings and construction projects that exceed or meet the owner's project requirements (OPR). Once a project undergoes commissioning, there are opportunities to prevent or eliminate problems inexpensively through proactive quality techniques, verify systems that are installed and working correctly and benchmark those correct operations.

When reviewing the final commissioning report, a major goal, which is almost always accomplished, is to lower overall first costs and life-cycle costs for the owner. Providing documentation and records on the design, construction, and functional and performance testing can facilitate ongoing operation and maintenance of the facility—this can be done by implementing trend logs and various automated Cx tools to enable the Operations and Maintenance (O&M) process. With these Cx goals and others, the important deliverable is to maintain performance for the entire life cycle of the building.

Common Barriers Found in the Commissioning Process

Every new and existing construction project is unique, but many of the same design and construction issues arise from time and time again. Commissioning and the efforts involved are focused on avoiding these reoccurring issues, and in many cases the fee building owners pay for commissioning is paid back by the costs avoided detecting and resolving issues early, for a new construction project, for example. Many of the issues below are fairly easy to correct or plan for and, as many experts know, without commissioning involvement, new building projects are delivered without these types of issues ever being corrected.

  1. Mechanical equipment sequences of operation: Frequently, sequences of operation in mechanical design documents create conflict between systems or could be unclear to installers and controls contractors. At times, they are missing entirely from the design documents and do usually not integrate energy savings operations.
  2. Missing mechanical equipment in design documents: Missing mechanical system equipment in the design documents, such as mini-split systems serving IT closets, exhaust fans, dampers, access panels, and valves, is common upon walkthroughs.
  3. Electrical circuits not sized appropriately for loads: It is important for Cx agent to inspect circuit capacity and comment when the design includes loads larger than circuit components can accommodate, or when circuit components are oversized significantly, and financial savings are available by reducing components to a more appropriate size.
  4. Building enclosure infiltration: Enclosure issues can impact multiple performance issues in a building including HVAC performance, building pressures and increase the risk of moisture intrusion issues. If a properly design building enclosure system with correctly aligned thermal, air and moisture control layers are not problems included from moisture intrusion, poor indoor air quality and comfort complaints are common. Missing details, incorrectly placed barriers, disconnects in the continuous systems are all common design issues that will impact the building performance for years to come. Sealants or transition materials may not be specified correctly at intersections of components or there might be missing sealant requirements for penetrations by fasteners when installing cladding or bracing for exterior shading. Wall sections may promote thermal bridging, which is the unrestricted movement of heat through the wall section. This leads to excessive energy leakage and lost cost.

Meghan McDermott: "The main barrier to building enclosure commission (BECx) is lack of understanding of the process and fears that the cost is too expensive. Several building owners I have talked to have asked their team about including building enclosure commissioning and it has been scrapped because of cost. When I investigated the cost estimates, they were including all of the performance testing in the NIBS guide instead of just the performance testing that was beneficial to the owner. As with any commissioning project the main objective is to follow the Owner’s Project Requirements (OPR), if the owner wants to do just a few performance tests related to the enclosure that is fine; there is no need or budget to cover all the performance tests listed in NIBS."

Preventing Barriers

Gather installed technology manuals, drawings, specs, and other documents before starting commissioning process – it is difficult to locate documents at manufacturers resources or websites. Ensuring that the building is prepped and there are set times for operating is critically important, keeping to a schedule and keeping track of daily changes will add up to significant positives that will likely not delay the project. Understanding the most frequent commissioning issues documented in both the design and construction phases of new or existing building commissioning projects can give building owners and managers a leg-up on ensuring these issues are resolved quickly and efficiently.

Meghan McDermott (A): "For the BECx discuss with the Owner at the beginning the reason they want to include BECx in their project. Many times, during the discussion you will find they have had specific issues in their existing building inventory. The Owner will be able to provide insight into what performance testing is critical to their needs; include performance testing that will address the issues from previous projects and where common failures occur, not everything in the NIBS guide."

Trends in the Cx Industry

Meghan McDermott (A): "LEED Version 4 including Building Enclosure Commissioning credit instead of just getting an Innovation in Design credit will likely increase the number of projects we see pursuing building enclosure commissioning."

The Commissioning process has been practiced for years but has been required and marketed in various ways. Historically, voluntary green building certification standards have been the primary driver for Cx standards, specifically for LEED and ENERGY STAR building certifications. Green building certifications have their own set checklist of requirements that the Cx agent must complete to obtain the credit or compliance for that specific project. Although, with a wider and advancing market growing for green building across the U.S., sustainability goals, building codes, and utility incentives have been implementing required Cx standards into state-wide building codes and utility incentives.

For example, a successful market-based policy measure known as commercial building benchmarking has been making its way across the U.S. for several years and is becoming more and more popular. Several states such as California, Washington and Maryland have adopted commercial building benchmarking laws which vary from state-to-state. With the energy code being implemented across various states and mandates such as benchmarking laws are becoming more and more popular, the push for Cx will not only become good practice, but will be required for testing and maintaining optimal building performance.

 

Buildings at Risk, Like Grenfell, Typically Have a Compliance Flaw

Tue, 2019-06-04 13:06

A recent article states the following as fact, where words are highlighted so that these comments can be evaluated by the reader:

  • When fire broke out at Grenfell Tower in London, the flames were whisked through the 24-story structure with astonishing speed……
  • Outrage spread quickly when Britons learned the cheap cladding that shrouded the tower had turned it into a death trap……

Nearly two years after the Grenfell fire in June 2017, this is what we found of the government’s efforts, which have left tens of thousands of people at risk:

  • About 16,000 private apartments are still wrapped in the kind of exterior cladding that fed the Grenfell fire.
  • Their owners feel trapped in tinderboxes they cannot sell, and some residents have felt compelled to join round-the-clock patrols of their buildings, always on guard for a spark or whiff of smoke.
  • The government did move fairly quickly to strip the dangerous cladding from public housing towers, but people in approximately 8,400 public apartments await a full repair.
  • Many of the business-friendly regulations that allowed Grenfell to be built on the cheap remain in place, despite a promise to rethink them top to bottom.
  • The government has been slow to look at other types of flammable coverings that may be putting at least 340 additional apartment towers in danger.
  • A year before the fire, contractors re-clad Grenfell Tower with a form of low-cost aluminum paneling. The cladding was banned in the United States and many European countries because if a fire breaks out, it allows the flames to spread quickly.
  • But English building rules were more lenient. As long as the cladding’s surface — the aluminum — was nonflammable, it mattered less what was inside. In this case, that meant a middle layer of plastic that amounted to a sheet of solidified fuel.

This begs a rhetorical question, is this Sargent Friday’s “just the facts ma’am”, or is this journalism of another type? Thoughts?

The goal of professional journalism is to provide well-referenced facts and allow a reader to be discerning via their intellect. Here is a short list of more than 30 readily available articles, which provide key known facts:

  1. Grenfell BRE Report: If Code Followed, Likely Wouldn't Have Happened A Building Research Establishment (BRE) report summarizing the investigation into the deadly Grenfell Tower fire last year in London has been leaked, and several causes for the tragedy were identified. Each of the following excerpts from the report are linked to the online report.
  2. Would Smoke Alarms and Sprinklers Have Saved Grenfell's Installed Cladding? According to news reports since the fire, it seems it spread cladding that was applied to the building as part of a refurbishment completed last year
  3. London's Grenfell Fire: Will Plastics Be Inappropriately Blamed? At least 58 people are dead, or presumed dead, after a huge fire raged through the night at a west London 24-storey tower block called Grenfell Tower.
  4. Post Grenfell, Do You Know the Code and Your Cladding Options? Given recent concern over combinations of foam plastic insulated sheathing (FPIS) with different types of cladding since the Grenfell Tower fire, it is worth taking a specific look at both the extent of cladding options available with FPIS and the important restrictions.
  5. Grenfell Fire Should Not Spur Code Changes in the U.S. Just over a year ago, a fire in London’s Grenfell tower killed 72 people and had building industries around the globe taking a closer look at fire protection. However in America, what happened to Grenfell is unlikely to occur because a building like Grenfell would not have been built in the first place.
  6. ICC Provides Perspective on Combustible 'Cladding Systems' This short article by the International Code Council briefly discusses the 2018 International Building Code (IBC) requirements in terms of fire safety and what to look for in plan review and inspections when cladding is used on a noncombustible wall.

  7. NFPA 285 and Code Conforming Design – Reliable or Not? The evidence supporting the effectiveness of NFPA 285 is very strong. Moreover, history bears out this conclusion as found in this report sponsored by DuPont.

Building Research Establishment (BRE) report summarizing the investigation into the deadly Grenfell Tower fire last year in London, and several causes for the tragedy were identified. The report states that Grenfell Tower as originally constructed provided “very high levels of passive fire protection,” but that a refurbishment undertaken between 2014 and 2016 was not performed correctly, and opened multiple avenues for fire spread, in the event of an accidental fire.

Essentially, the report makes clear that had the refurbishment been completed to code, it is highly unlikely the fire would have spread beyond the original flat nor would there have been any loss of life. 

Between 2014 and 2016, Grenfell Tower received a new cladding and insulation system as part of a refurbishment.  The BRE report notes that both the insulation and the aluminum composite panels used provided combustible fuel for the fire. These materials have been used successfully for many years, and when installed in a code-compliant manner, are properly separated from living spaces and use detailing to prevent the spread of the fire inside the wall to the next higher floor.

In the case of the Grenfell Tower refurbishment, however, key details were ignored which allowed the fire to reach the cladding, and once there, to spread without check.  New windows were installed in a way that “lacked any barriers to fire spread between flats and the cladding system” and cavity barriers in the cladding system meant to expand to block off the cavity during a fire were too small to expand fully, and in many cases, improperly installed. 

Click to enlarge.

These shortcomings allowed the fire to easily move from interior living space to the exterior façade (and vice versa), and spread quickly across the façade. Fortunately, when buildings similar to Grenfell Tower are constructed in the U.S., they are subject to the International Building Code (IBC). Building code requirements in the United States are different from those used to construct Grenfell Tower. It is clear from the report’s conclusions that enforcement of the code is the most effective way to prevent similar occurrences in both the U.S. and U.K.

With limited exceptions for some one-story buildings, Chapter 26 of the IBC requires buildings of type I-IV construction of any height which contain foam plastic insulation to comply with National Fire Protection Agency standard 285 (NFPA 285).  To comply, testing and professional engineering analysis are performed where the proposed wall and cladding system is subjected to fire exiting from a window (as happened with the Grenfell Tower). To pass, fire tests and related professional engineering analysis must show that fire spread vertically or horizontally along the cladding beyond the immediate area is less than the time it would take for the inhabitants to evacuate (i.e. the NFPA measurement of this concept is ten feet of vertical and five feet of horizontal flame spread away from the window opening during the 30 minute test.)

Given the report’s conclusions regarding the construction detailing and the resulting spread of fire in the Grenfell Tower event, a key questions is: “Does this event reflect expected fire resistance performance, in code compliant construction, in a way that should cause significant regulatory changes for U.S. buildings?”  

It is clear, if designers, builders and installers perform in a manner that conforms with the requirements of the IBC, the 30 years of demonstrated effective and safe performance, when using NFPA 285 and IBC Chapter 26, will continue.

 

Does APA have a Design Value and QC Conflict of Interest?

Tue, 2019-06-04 11:06
Building Codes

APA the Engineered Wood Association is a market development organization for structural engineered wood products manufacturers. APA says they are focused on engineered wood developments, yet when a highly engineered wood fiber composite product has more favorable market performance characteristics, engineered wood is “not so good.”

Graphic 1: APA’s public home page providing its perspective on a sister highly engineered wood fiber composite product. Why would they denigrate another wood fiber product? Click to enlarge.

For commodity products like OSB, market promotion is largely APA brand focused. The approach taken includes the following examples:

  1. APA’s Wall Bracing Calculator
  2.  “Value Engineering
  3. Sustainable Buildings, Sustainable Future

These are all tools to promote OSB use created and published by APA. At the same time APA also serves as a third party inspection agency for OSB manufacturers. What is more important to APA, sales or QC? What would happen in most companies if the QC department reported to the sales/marketing department?

To further strengthen these marketing efforts, APA publishes reports critical of competitive products in order to advance the sales of APA-branded commodity OSB.

  1. Takeaways from 2015 Texas Tornadoes
  2. Texas Tornado Damage Assessment Report
  3. Resilient Construction

conflict of interest
n. a situation in which a person has a duty to more than one person or organization, but cannot do justice to the actual or potentially adverse interests of both parties. This includes when an individual's personal interests or concerns are inconsistent with the best for a customer, or when a public official's personal interests are contrary to his/her loyalty to public business. An attorney, an accountant, a business adviser or realtor cannot represent two parties in a dispute and must avoid even the appearance of conflict. He/she may not join with a client in business without making full disclosure of his/her potential conflicts, he/she must avoid commingling funds with the client, and never, never take a position adverse to the customer.

These all seem like relevant “marketing association” activities and pretty straight-forward, until you consider the following observations, which point to at the very least, an appearance of a series of conflicts of interest that seem to bias objectivity:

  1. APA does market development, and the APA brand is the key to market development.
  2. APA gets paid by the manufacturers of OSB to do this market development and to further build the APA brand.
  3. APA gets paid by the manufacturers of OSB, through its IAS ISO/IEC 17020 quality auditing program (IAS accreditation number AA-6), to perform the manufacturer’s 3rd party inspection of product quality and maintain the OSB design values used in the market. All of this maintains OSB competitiveness.
  4. APA is accredited by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) as an ISO/IEC 17065 product, process and service certification body and “ICC Report” writer (SCC File # 10012).
  5. Through these accreditations, APA provides certification to clients that conform to product standards as well as APA policies. All APA manufacturers are subject to ongoing audits of the client’s quality system, internal inspections and conformance to the product standard.

What would happen in most companies if the QC and engineering departments reported to the sales/marketing department?

  1. APA also gets paid by the manufacturers of OSB to create and publish the OSB voluntary product standard for producing a quality product and associated design values for OSB use in the market. As APA states:

 “APA has a long and extensive history in building codes and standards development activities. It serves, for example, as the secretariat for the standing committees of U.S. Product Standard PS 1 for Structural Plywood, the consensus softwood plywood standard, and Voluntary Product Standard PS 2, the U.S. harmonized performance standard developed under the U.S.-Canada Free Trade Agreement. APA has developed performance standards over the years for numerous products, including, for example, plywood siding, wood structural panel sheathing, structural glued laminated timber (glulam), wood I-joists, rim board, and cross-laminated timber. APA issues APA Product Reports designed to help manufacturers expedite market entry of their products.”

  1. Finally, APA gets paid by the manufacturers of OSB to advocate during the building code creation process to ensure the code remains favorable to OSB. As stated in a 2016 newsletter “APA and Coalition for Fair Energy Code staff attended the International Code Council Group B Committee Action Hearings for the 2018 International Fire Code (IFC), International Building Code (IBC) – Structure, in Louisville Kentucky in April (April 17 to 27 2016) ……. Among 22 APA change proposals, 16 were approved. None of the disapproved APA proposals are considered critical to the acceptance or market access of APA member’s products….” Contact BJ Yeh for more information.

Click to enlarge.

Maybe all of this is best defined by the leadership of APA themselves in the following set of articles that show there is a very strong desire to create OSB competitive advantage by whatever means necessary:

  1. Wood Structural Panel Lateral Capacity? APA - “Not Sure”
  2. APA - IRC Allowable Design Values for OSB Wall Bracing = 175 PLF 
  3. Competition Improves Everyone; APA Disagrees 

Graphic 1 SBCA proposed IRC code change proposal to fix OSB design values to be in alignment with the APA-BSSC report stands  undisputed by APA and has been confirmed by SBCA/SBCRI testing.

Clearly, given all of the information above and the APA letters found in PDF form below, APA does not appear to be unbiased in their approach to OSB design values, third party quality assurance and promotion of OSB in the market.

A question that has been asked is how hard would it be for a plaintiff’s lawyer in a construction defect case involving OSB to establish an APA conflict of interest with the facts provided herein?

Please review and send us your point of view with respect to these facts and if you were on a jury what your decision would be?

PDF Reference Links

For additional information on the performance of wood structural panels, please visit the following webpage on OSB as a Raw Material and the following articles on performance of building materials in high winds and as tested.

 

Tornados Wreck Havoc in Mid-US, Blame?

Mon, 2019-06-03 10:26
Housing & Construction

Tornado damage in Jefferson City, Mo. as seen on Thursday, May 23, 2019. Photo by David Carson, St. Louis Post-Dispatch.

In the past few weeks, weather systems throughout Texas, Oklahoma, Missouri, Indiana and Ohio have had a significant impact on the built environment. As is well known, tornados cause severe stress on buildings where the high localized wind loading conditions find the weak point of the structure quickly. This usually is at the location of a wood nail or anchor bolt connection or in our testing experience a knot or slope of grain deviation in a tension lumber member. An interesting point is that most studs in wall systems are meant to see compression forces not tension, which also may be a structural weak point.

As the pictures attest, finding the key building material weak point that caused the structural performance to be a debris field is challenging, if not impossible, to do.

Questions that need to be sincerely addressed follow, which include but are certainly not limited to:

  1. Was the building built to code?
  2. If not, what were the as-built conditions?
  3. Which aspects of the structure were built to code?
  4. Which were not?
  5. What is the cause/effect analysis for each code compliant and each non-code compliant condition?

Tornado damage in Jefferson City, Mo. as seen on Thursday, May 23, 2019. Photo by David Carson, St. Louis Post-Dispatch.

Is there any possibility of benchmarking building performance? For example:

  1. Does one building built identically to another perform differently?
  2. Why did it perform differently?
  3. Different weather conditions?
  4. Different methods of connections?
  5. Different building orientation?
  6. Different window and door conditions?
  7. Are there two similar houses in the wind zone to study, one that has performed well and another less well? This makes professional analysis much easier where one can isolate the “why did this happen” questions and begin to develop potential remedies.

It is obvious that proper construction implementation is key to satisfactory building material performance. Paying close attention to all connecting systems that make up the load path is essential.

The most important outcomes of poor building performance in a high wind or seismic event are that no one gets hurt; the construction industry continues to learn and evolve; and design and installation best practices improve.

Tornado damage in Jefferson City, Mo. as seen on Thursday, May 23, 2019. Photo by David Carson, St. Louis Post-Dispatch.

The entire construction industry can greatly benefit by staying focused on providing framer-friendly details that are easy to understand and implement. It’s critical that we come together with the goal of fostering innovation, using accepted engineering practice, creating installation best practices, working closely with professional framers and assisting building departments to focus inspections on key load path elements. We all are educators. By working together, we will significantly improve the built environment.   

The following drone footage, captured May 23, shows the stark aftermath of a tornado that hit Jefferson County, MO. 

For additional information on the performance of wood structural panels, please visit the following webpage on OSB as a Raw Material and the following articles on performance of building materials in high winds and as tested.

 

Johns Manville Names John Vasuta as New President of Engineered Products Business

Wed, 2019-05-22 14:53
Press Releases

Johns Manville (JM), a leading manufacturer and marketer of premium-quality building and specialty products and a Berkshire Hathaway company, announced John Vasuta is the new President of the company’s Engineered Products business.

“John is an accomplished leader and a welcome addition to JM’s leadership team,” said Mary Rhinehart, JM’s President and CEO. “He brings to JM a proven track record of successfully growing businesses and global commercial leadership.”

Vasuta will lead a global business that manufactures premium-quality glass fiber nonwovens, polyester spunbonds and glass fibers for the building and construction industry, as well as for automotive, industrial and residential applications.

JM products cover an extensive range of applications such as waterproofing membranes, flooring, building and technical insulation, air and liquid filtration, energy storage, composites and gypsum boards. The business operates manufacturing plants in the United States, Germany, Slovakia and China.

“Johns Manville is built on a rich history and has a well-earned reputation as a global market leader,” Vasuta said. “I am excited to join the company and to lead the Engineered Products business.”

Vasuta most recently worked at Bridgestone Corp. as President and Managing Director, Firestone Building Products International as well as Global Senior Vice President, Firestone Building Products. He joined Bridgestone as Deputy General Counsel and later held a variety of executive-level jobs, including President of Bridgestone’s 250 commercial store division and VP of International Sales and Operations for building products.

He worked earlier in his career in private law practices and the semi-conductor industry.

Vasuta earned a bachelor’s degree in engineering, an MBA and a Juris Doctorate, all from the University of Akron.

 

Firestone Building Products Opens Insulation Facility in Germany

Wed, 2019-05-22 14:47
Press Releases

Firestone Building Products Company, LLC (Firestone), a subsidiary of Bridgestone Americas and an industry leading global manufacturer of commercial roofing and building solutions, announced today the opening of its first greenfield plant in Heinsberg, Germany. The facility, which broke ground in March 2017, employs a workforce of approximately twenty and is located in the Dremmen District of Heinsberg, Germany.

The new facility represents an opportunity to supplement Firestone insulation production in North America in order to meet growing demand for complete roofing solutions in a global market. Firestone currently operates fifteen manufacturing plants worldwide and sells approximately 90 million square meters of insulation materials per year all over the world.

"Investing in global production capabilities allows us to better serve our customers in key locations around the world," said Philip Moors, managing director of Europe and Asia for Firestone. "Demand for building products continues to grow in Germany and throughout Europe, and we look forward to partnering with our customers in the local market and beyond to provide industry-leading roofing solutions."

The facility's location in Germany now allows contractors to purchase Firestone RESISTA insulation that can be used in conjunction with EPDM and TPO membranes to install a complete Firestone roofing system in every Firestone market in Europe. The production and sales of Firestone polyiso (PIR) insulation boards started first week of May.

"We couldn't have hoped for a better outcome," said Wolfgang Dieder, the mayor of Heinsberg, "The establishment of a production facility that manufactures high performance insulation materials is a big win for our town. We're thrilled that 'Made in Heinsberg' Firestone products are soon to be used all over Europe. Our collaboration with all of those responsible at Firestone was perfect from day one."

Panattoni Europe, a leading project developer specializing in industrial and logistics-related real estate, was responsible for the planning and implementation of the project. Goldbeck International acted as the prime contractor during construction.

 

Ox Details How Integrated Sheathing Increases Cycle Times

Wed, 2019-05-22 14:38
Building ScienceEnergy Efficiency

One less trip around the house.

What would it mean to cut an entire step out of exterior wall construction? A full day saved? Two days? More?

Cutting project timelines is critical to sales and profitability. Multiply the effect of fewer construction days across all projects in your 2019 pipeline. You may be talking weeks, even months of cumulative production savings.

A new class of one-and-done insulated structural sheathing that complies with the 2018 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC Table R402.1.2 – Insulation and Fenestration Requirements By Component) now helps home builders close projects with unprecedented speed.

New Normal

Complying with the code’s moisture/vapor, air, and continuous insulation requirements makes for a tighter, higher-performing building envelope. But asking framers to make multiple passes around the house may not be the best use of their time, especially when alternative methods have been proven in tens of thousands of U.S. homes.

Charlie Devine of Afton, Minn. has closely observed the slow but determined transition to a more streamlined home building workflow. “You’re seeing many within the building supply chain adapt to a new normal. We can cut construction time by two or three days in many cases,” says the national accounts and energy advisor to OX Engineered Products.

Surprise Benefits

Devine understands why some balk at a one-and-done approach. Structural insulation costs more. However, the extra investment quickly fades when weighed against a traditional multi-pass approach. “When you examine the dollars, structural insulation is the better buy. See for yourself. Run your own numbers. The financial benefits are substantial,” he says.

There are also less-publicized benefits home builders can overlook. Take material weight. “We manufacture a structural insulation product called OX-IS. OX-IS is about 1/3 the weight of OSB. That translates into about 2-1/2 less tons of house weight. Less weight could mean a happier, more productive staff,” Devine explains.

The insulation side is similarly intriguing. “Exposed studs and headers are thermal bridges that undermine HVAC efficiency and owner comfort. Continuous insulation pays for itself from day one by sealing-off thermal bridges,” explains Devine.

Nearly 500 Homes a Week
Skeptics may wonder how a lightweight, all-in-one structural insulation panel can address so many exterior wall performance issues. “OX-IS structural insulation was used on tens of thousands of houses last year alone. Structural insulation has been around for more than 50 years,” adds Devine.

For an industry eager to meet aggressive project timelines, it’s good to know there are proven sheathing alternatives that help streamline workflows. To learn more about all-in-one sheathing alternatives, visit https://www.oxengineeredproducts.com/product/ox-is/.

 

Demilec Spray Foam Adds Resilient Construction Classification

Wed, 2019-05-22 14:31
Building ScienceEnergy Efficiency

As storms continue to ravage coastal areas, communities are looking to build with stronger, more advanced materials designed to better withstand extreme weather events. Closed-cell spray foam insulation is the most efficient, cost-effective material available and meets all building code and national flood insurance requirements. The Demilec Heatlok Series Closed-Cell Spray Foam offers the newest technology advancements in medium-density, compact installations with products proven to be air, vapor, and water barrier resistant. The complete Demilec product portfolio offers commercial design professionals and construction companies (commercial and residential) innovative solutions with trusted results.

“We understand the devastation many coastal communities face and the amount of information and regulations that need to be addressed during building efforts can be overwhelming,” said Tom Harris, Vice President of Demilec Building Science. “At Demilec, we want to help ease that burden by offering innovative and effective solutions that will protect these areas for years to come. Closed-cell spray foam is just one of our products proven to help improve structural integrity and resistance to floodwater damage.” 

In addition to being named a National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Class 5 building material, the Demilec Heatlok Series of closed-cell spray foam products are engineered to be eco-conscious, offer expedient installation options, as well as downstream energy return on investment. 

“We want to encourage the use of closed-cell spray foam products and help educate industry professionals on the long-term benefits of using NFIP Class 5 building materials,” Harris said. “Modern building technologies and products are constantly evolving, along with government and city regulations, which is why it’s very important to partner with trusted manufactures willing to guarantee their products. We have the scientific research and industry expertise to stand behind every product we make.”

Construction industry professionals and consumers will benefit from remarkable energy savings because these products seal all areas where they are installed, creating both air and moisture barriers. Users will see a decrease in outside pollutants such as dust and allergens and outside noise disturbances. Closed-cell spray foam insulation can be used in new building projects, as well as retrofitted into existing structures. The Demilec Building Science Group closely monitors Department of Energy and NFIP requirements to ensure that products meet the highest possible standards. This allows construction partners and design professionals to install and specify Demilec closed-cell spray foam products with confidence.

Industry professionals, business owners and home owners can learn more about the benefits of closed-cell spray foam and the Demilec product guarantee by visiting www.demilec.com/Products/Closed-Celland connecting with Demilec through social channels.

 

Kingspan Insulated Panels Added to Leading Spec Software

Wed, 2019-05-22 14:27
Business

Kingspan Insulated Panels announced that several of its products are now available in the Building Systems Design (BSD) SpecLink-E platform, one of the industry leaders in the spec-writing software field. SpecLink-E is the most advanced master guide specification software to improve efficiency, accuracy and collaboration – and now, users can integrate Kingspan insulated metal panels.

BSD SpecLink-E’s innovative tools allow businesses to synchronize their specs and BIM models, collaborate more efficiently with cloud technology, and quickly produce cost estimates. It allows users to create specs up to 70% faster.

Kingspan panels will now be integrated directly into 11,000+ design professionals’ office masters for inclusion in projects across the nation.

The following Kingspan products are now available on BSD SpecLink-E: KS Series, Optimo, KarrierPanel Barrier Wall, KS Series Granitstone, MF Fire Rated, MF QT Acoustical, BENCHMARK Designwall 2000, BENCHMARK Designwall 4000, KingSeam and KingRib.

Kingspan places a premium on building construction technology innovation. Last year, the company introduced QuadCore Technology, its most technologically-advanced metal panel insulation backed by an industry-first 30-year thermal warranty. Kingspan and QuadCore Technology were both honored in the 2018 Architectural Products Product Innovation Awards for innovation in the built environment.

 

Knauff Insulation Names Parrish as New CEO

Wed, 2019-05-22 14:24
Business

Knauf Insulation, Inc. (KINA), a leading manufacturer of glass mineral wool insulation, announced today that industry veteran Matthew Parrish has been named chief executive officer (CEO) of the company.

Parrish’s elevation to the position of president and CEO is part of a broader reshaping of the Knauf Group global leadership teams following the company’s recent merger with USG Corporation. He replaces Christopher Griffin, who was recently named CEO of USG Corporation. The two companies are going to continue to operate as separate entities.

“Matt is a dynamic, progressive leader with deep management expertise and a track record of delivering measurable results in our industry,” said Manfred Grundke, general partner of Knauf Group. “We have full confidence he will thrive in this new role while continuing the focus on developing and engaging the Knauf team to effectively execute the strategy that was set in motion under previous leadership.”

“Matt’s demonstrated ability to drive sustainable growth will continue to help Knauf lead the industry,” said Griffin, who served as CEO of KINA for three years and originally hired Parrish in June 2017.

Parrish joined KINA as vice president of Residential and Light Commercial Sales and has significant expertise in commercial excellence, product management, cross-functional diversification and talent development. With the industry changing at breakneck speed, Parrish is ready to hit the ground running.

“The norms of yesterday are not the norms of today,” Parrish said. “Customers are expecting more, and we need to recognize that and deliver. I’m convinced we have the right people to handle the ever-changing dynamics of our customers and our industry. And we have a winning strategy in place. We need to stay laser-focused on that strategy while being nimble and agile in our execution.”

Parrish has over 29 years of experience in the building materials industry with primary focuses in the disciplines of insulation and cement. He grew up just outside the Kansas City area in Missouri and received his bachelor’s degree from the University of Missouri-Columbia. 

“I look forward to bringing my cross-functional leadership style into this new role and carrying out the strategy set forth by my predecessor,” Parrish said. “KINA is and will continue to be a leader in sustainable thermal and acoustical glass mineral wool insulation.”

For additional information, please read the following articles:

 

6 Energy Efficiency Recommendations from the NYC Urban Green Council

Wed, 2019-05-22 14:10
Energy Efficiency

Building owners and equipment suppliers don’t always use the same vocabulary when discussing engineering projects, and this results in missed opportunities to improve energy efficiency. According to the NYC Urban Green Council, building owners often have their problem areas identified, but are unaware of the existing solutions. As a result, technology suppliers conclude that demand for energy-efficient products is low or nonexistent. Improved communication between both parties could bring many innovative projects in NYC.

To help solve this issue, the Urban Green Council carried out a study of the energy efficiency market in NYC. They identified six types of building upgrades that could have a high demand, but where few projects are materialized due to miscommunication between users and suppliers.

ENERGY EFFICIENCY UPGRADE

APPLICATION

POTENTIAL SAVINGS

Packaged condensing boiler

Combined space heating and hot water

6%

Split-type heat pumps

Upgrading packaged terminal air conditioners

4%

High-efficiency modular space cooling

Retail and commercial spaces

3.5%

Insulated wrap

Slab edges and balconies

3%

Low-conductivity shelf angles

Masonry walls

3%

Advanced curtain wall with unitized assembly

New constructions

13%

Note that the savings values provided above are percentages of total building consumption, not just the building system being upgraded.

1) Packaged Condensing Boilers for Combined Space Heating and Hot Water

A packaged unit combining space heating and domestic hot water would be very attractive for NYC property owners, according to the Urban Green Council. In simple terms, exhaust heat from the space heating boiler is recovered for the domestic hot water (DHW) system, reducing total consumption.

The concept is viable with conventional condensing boilers, but installation is very complex because a heat exchanger is required. If equipment suppliers offered an integrated solution, the installation would be simplified greatly. This also reduces the number of man-hours required, making the project faster and more affordable.

2) Split-Type Heat Pumps Designed to Replace PTACs

Packaged terminal air conditioners (PTAC) are often chosen in NYC buildings for their ease of installation and lower upfront cost that other AC systems. However, their long term ownership cost is very high:

  1. PTACs interrupt the building envelope, increasing summer heat gain and winter heat loss.
  2. They also have a low efficiency themselves.

Split-type air-source heat pumps could be designed to fit into the same spaces as PTACs, while adding improved insulation and air tightness. Ventilation can be built-in as well, achieving a complete HVAC solution that is easy to retrofit.

3) High-Efficiency and Modular Air Conditioners

Commercial spaces tend to have very different operating schedules, and deploying a central chiller plant is impractical in many cases. Direct expansion units are more common for this reason, but they come with a lower efficiency.

Compressor designs for chillers have achieved impressive efficiency, but the concept is rarely deployed at the smaller scale of commercial spaces (typically below 20 tons). Modular systems with newer compressor models would achieve savings of around 30% according to the Urban Green Council.

4) Insulated Wrap for Balconies and Floor Slabs

Heat loss occurs through balconies and floor slabs, since they cause an interruption in the building envelope. The negative effect of one slab is small, but it becomes significant when you consider an entire building.

This issue can be solved by applying insulated wrap around the edges of balconies and slabs. In addition, this is a versatile solution that works in both new constructions and existing buildings.

5) Low-Conductivity Shelf Angles for Masonry Walls

Shelf angles are the structural elements that attach masonry walls to the main building structure. However, conventional shelf angles are highly conductive because they are made of steel, contributing to unwanted heat transfer across the building envelope. Newer composite materials can accomplish the same function without the heat loss, as long as they offer the same structural and fire resistance properties of conventional shelf angles.

6) Advanced Curtain Walls

Curtain walls are common in newer NYC buildings, but their envelope performance is very poor. In many cases, simple brick and mortar walls provide better insulation. Buildings with curtain walls often have efficient mechanical and electrical systems, but optimal performance is not achieved because of the poor thermal envelope.

High-performance curtain walls are already standardized and widely used in other parts of the world, such as Europe, but the concept has been slow to enter the US market. These versions of curtain walls have integrated insulation measures, achieving synergy with efficient space heating and cooling systems.

Conclusion

There are many untapped opportunities for energy efficiency measures in NYC, but miscommunication between suppliers and property owners hold them back. Getting an energy audit from a qualified engineering company is highly recommended to identify the best upgrades for your property.